Camp Fire Academy
Learning path
Complete UI/UX Masterclass UI/UX Design Foundations UI/UX Design Intermediate Advanced UX Strategy
Specialisations
Fintech & Banking UI/UX UI/UX with AI Training UX for Leaders Design Thinking Figma Training
Most requested
AI for Workplace Productivity Excel for Business Power BI & Business Intelligence Cybersecurity Awareness PDPA Compliance Data Protection Officer Browse the full catalogue →
For teams
Corporate & In-House Training LMS & Self-Paced Learning Events
Company
About Contact Verify Certificate WhatsApp

Sustainability Reporting (GRI and Bursa)

Sustainability reporting in Malaysia stopped being a narrative exercise when Bursa aligned its listing requirements with the National Sustainability Reporting Framework and brought IFRS S1 and S2 in as the baseline standards. Reports now need comparative quantitative data, a defensible materiality process, and governance disclosure that describes what the board actually does. This programme covers the requirement set and then works on the part most teams find hardest: getting reliable numbers out of the business in time to report them.

Programme Agenda

The Reporting Landscape

How Bursa listing requirements, the National Sustainability Reporting Framework, IFRS S1 and S2, and GRI relate to each other. What is mandatory for your entity, what is voluntary, and where the frameworks overlap so one data set serves several.

Scope and Timing

The phased implementation by issuer group, which annual periods are captured, and the comparative data expectation. Working backwards from a reporting deadline to when measurement has to start.

Materiality That Withstands Challenge

Identifying sustainability matters, stakeholder engagement, and the assessment process behind a materiality matrix. Why the matrix itself is the least important output, and what an assurance provider will ask about the process.

Governance and Strategy Disclosure

Describing board oversight, management responsibility and how sustainability considerations enter strategy and capital allocation. Writing this without either overstating maturity or admitting nothing happens.

Climate Disclosure Under IFRS S2

Physical and transition risk, scenario considerations, and the emissions disclosure expectation. What a first-year climate disclosure can reasonably contain and how to signal a build-up over subsequent years.

Indicators and Data Collection

The common sustainability matters and their indicators. Building a data collection process across sites and functions, defining each metric once, and closing the gap between what is measured and what must be reported.

Data Quality and Assurance Readiness

Source documentation, calculation methodology, estimation and its disclosure, internal review, and the audit trail an assurance engagement examines. Preparing for limited assurance before it is required.

Writing the Report

Structure, length, and the balance between narrative and data. Reporting a target that was missed, presenting restated figures, and the review process before publication. Participants draft and critique sections.

Learning Outcomes:
Map which reporting requirements apply to your entity and on what timeline
Run a materiality assessment whose process survives assurance questioning
Draft governance and strategy disclosures that are accurate and useful
Prepare a first climate-related disclosure and plan its development
Define indicators once and collect them consistently across the business
Build the documentation and audit trail an assurance provider will need
Write a report that handles missed targets and restatements credibly

Duration: 2 Days (16 Hours)
Training Hours: 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM
Level: All levels
Training Mode: Physical, Online, or Hybrid
HRD Corp SBL-KHAS Claimable
Certificate of Completion included

Frequently Asked Questions

Sustainability and ESG managers, finance and reporting teams, investor relations, company secretaries, internal auditors, and the operational managers who own the underlying data. Suppliers being asked for ESG data by listed customers also attend.

Increasingly, yes. Large non-listed companies are drawn in through the reporting framework and through supply chain requirements, and banks are asking for the same data in lending assessments. The scope module works through where a non-listed entity actually stands.

Only as far as the reporting disclosure requires. Quantifying Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions properly is a separate two-day programme, Carbon Accounting and GHG Inventories, which most reporting teams take alongside this one.

Content is reviewed before each delivery and the session states the position as at that date, including which issuer groups are in scope and for which periods. Where a requirement is announced but not yet effective, the session distinguishes the two.

Yes, this programme is HRD Corp SBL-KHAS claimable. Our team can assist your HR department with the documentation required for the grant application.

Yes. Any programme can be booked as a team day. Everyone works the same brief together, so your people come away having built something and knowing each other better.

If you are claiming under HRD Corp, the session has to fall at least 14 days after your HRD Corp approval. If you are not claiming, the date is flexible and we work around your calendar.

Put them on the self-paced e-learning instead. Your team works through the modules on our LMS in their own time, sits the assessment, and earns the same certificate, so nobody has to clear a full day together.

More in ESG and Sustainability